For a comprehensive overview, see our Injection Mold Complete Guide.
- 초도품 검사(FAI)는 새로운 금형으로 주조된 첫 부품이 대량 생산 전에 모든 치수, 재료 및 기능적 사양을 충족하는지 확인합니다.
- 완전한 FAI는 첫 3~5개 부품에 대해 벽 두께, 게이트 치수, 주요 허용오차(정밀 부품의 경우 일반적으로 ±0.05~0.1 mm), 그리고 재료 인증서를 포함하여 100%의 특징을 검사합니다.
- FAI는 항공우주(AS9102), 자동차(PPAP), 의료 기기(ISO 13485) 공급망에서 필수이며, 5,000개 이상의 부품 생산 런에 대해 강력히 권장됩니다.
- FAI를 생략하면 10,000개 이상의 부품이 성형된 후 결함을 발견할 위험이 있으며, $500 검사가 $50,000+ 이상의 폐기 문제로 바뀔 수 있습니다.
- ZetarMold에서는 FAI 결과가 구조화된 보고서로 문서화되며, 금형이 양산에 투입되기 전에 고객의 승인을 받습니다.
사출 성형에서 초품 검사란 무엇인가?
1 (FAI)는 새로운 사출 금형 또는 상당히 개조된 금형으로 생산된 첫 부품이 엔지니어링 도면의 모든 치수, 공차, 재료 및 기능적 요구 사항을 준수함을 확인하는 구조화된 문서화 검증 프로세스입니다. FAI는 일반적인 품질 검사가 아닙니다. 이는 최소 3~5개의 초도품 샘플에 대해 도면 특성 100%를 체계적으로, 특징별로 측정하는 것입니다. ZetarMold에서는 FAI를 금형 자격 인증과 대량 생산 사이의 최종 관문으로 간주합니다.
이 과정은 항공우주 제조 분야에서 시작되었으며 2, 하지만 현재는 자동차 산업(4 레벨 3), 의료 기기(ISO 13485), 정밀 전자 산업 분야의 규제 공급망에 플라스틱 부품을 출하하는 모든 제조업체는 문서화된 초도품 검사 보고서(FAIR)를 작성해야 합니다. 이 보고서가 없으면 고객은 귀사의 금형이 도면에 명시된 사항을 실제로 제작한다는 객관적 증거를 확인할 수 없습니다.
사출 성형 부품에서 FAI가 중요한 이유는 무엇인가?
사출 성형은 강철이 실제로 플라스틱을 주입할 때만 나타나는 여러 치수 변동 요인을 도입합니다: 캐비티 압력 분포, 냉각 균일성, 게이트 프리즈-오프 타이밍, 재료 수축 등이 있습니다. 재료 데이터시트에 게시된 명목 수축 값은 평균값이며 보장된 수치가 아닙니다. 0.5% 명목 수축률을 가진 ABS로 설계된 부품은 실제로 벽 두께, 용융 온도 및 패킹 압력에 따라 0.45~0.65%로 수축할 수 있습니다. FAI는 이러한 편차가 생산 문제가 되기 전에 포착합니다.
In our factory, we have seen cases where a mold passed T1 (first trial) visual inspection with flying colors, but FAI dimensional measurement revealed that a critical snap-fit arm was 0.15 mm undersized—within the mold’s steel tolerance, but outside the assembly fit requirement. Catching this at FAI cost two days of mold adjustment. Catching it after 50,000 parts would have been catastrophic.

초품 검사 보고서에는 무엇이 포함되나요?
완전한 초품 검사 보고서(FAIR)는 부품 도면에 명시된 모든 특성을 문서화합니다. 비항공우주 응용에도 AS9102 섹션 4 구조를 따르며, 이는 가장 엄격한 산업 프레임워크입니다. 보고서는 적격 품질 엔지니어의 승인을 받아야 하고 부품 프로그램의 생애 동안 보관되어야 합니다.
| FAIR 섹션 | 문서화된 내용 | 일반적인 승인 기준 |
|---|---|---|
| Part Number & Revision | 도면 번호, 개정 수준, 적용 날짜 | 고객이 발행한 도면과 100% 일치 |
| 재료 인증서 | 수지 로트 번호, 공급자 CoC, 재료 테스트 데이터 | UL, ASTM 또는 고객 재료 사양 충족 |
| 치수 풍선도 | 도면의 모든 치수에 풍선 번호 할당 | 모든 특징 검사 완료; 미해결 편차 0건 |
| 중요 특성 측정 | 모든 중요 치수에 대한 CMM 또는 캘리퍼 데이터 | 중요 특성에 대해 Cpk ≥ 1.33 |
| 외관/코스메틱 검사 | 표면 마무리, 색상, 용접선, 싱크 마크 | AQL 0.65 레벨 II 샘플링 계획을 충족합니다 |
| 기능 테스트 | 스냅 피트, 나선 맞물림, 조립 적합성 확인 | 모든 초도품 샘플에 대해 100% 통과 |
| 공정 파라미터 기록 | 사출 속도, 용융 온도, 냉각 시간, 충전 압력 | 향후 참조용으로 매개변수 보관 |
| 고객 승인 완료 | 고객 품질 대표가 FAIR 승인 | 생산 시작 전의 문서화된 승인 |
치수 풍선 표시 부분은 FAIR에서 가장 노동 집약적인 부분입니다. 도면에 표시된 모든 허용오차 항목—선형 치수, 반경, 구멍 직경, 5 기호—각각 고유한 풍선 번호를 받습니다. 각 풍선은 각 샘플 부품에서 측정되고, 실제 값은 기준 값과 허용 오차와 함께 기록됩니다. ZetarMold의 품질 팀은 일반적으로 중간 복잡성 부품에 대해 부품당 60–150개의 풍선 항목을 기록합니다.
“FAI requires measuring 100% of drawing features, not just critical dimensions.”True
AS9102 및 PPAP 기준에 따른 완전한 FAI는 도면에 있는 모든 치수, 허용 오차 및 사양을 검사하고 문서화해야 합니다. 선택적 검사(기능에 중요한 특성만 확인)는 유효한 FAI를 구성하지 않습니다. 실제로 이는 도면에 있는 모든 지시에 풍선 번호를 부여하고 각각에 대해 실제 측정 값을 기록하는 것을 의미합니다.
“A T1 trial run approval is equivalent to a First Article Inspection.”False
T1 승인과 FAI는 목적이 다릅니다. T1(첫 금형 시험)은 일반적으로 금형이 열리고 채워지고 기계적 문제 없이 배출되는 것을 확인하며 기본적인 시각 검사를 포함할 수 있습니다. FAI는 공식적이고 문서화된, 특성별 치수 및 재료 검증입니다. 금형은 T1을 통과할 수 있지만 눈에 보이지 않는 치수 편차(예: 허용 오차를 벗어난 0.12mm 벽 두께)로 FAI에서 실패할 수 있습니다.
How Is a First Article Inspection Performed Step by Step?
FAI follows a defined sequence that ensures all verification activities are completed before any data is recorded. Shortcuts—such as measuring parts before they have fully cooled to ambient temperature, or measuring only one of the three sample parts—invalidate the inspection and typically result in customer rejection of the FAIR.
Step 1 is part conditioning. Injection-molded parts must be conditioned at 23°C ±2°C for a minimum of 4 hours (per ASTM D618) before measurement. Parts measured immediately after molding will read differently due to residual heat and stress relaxation. Step 2 is drawing review: the quality engineer balloons every dimension and assigns a unique ID. Step 3 is CMM programming or fixture setup for measurement. Step 4 is measurement of all three to five sample parts, with actual values recorded. Step 5 is material and process record archiving.
Step 6 is Cpk analysis for critical features. For any dimension with a critical-to-function tolerance, we calculate the process capability index (Cpk). The accepted minimum is Cpk ≥ 1.33, which corresponds to a process running at least 4 sigma from its nearest tolerance limit. Features below this threshold require mold rework before FAI can be approved. Step 7 is customer submission and sign-off. The complete FAIR package is transmitted to the customer; written approval is required before production begins.
“Parts must be conditioned at 23°C for at least 4 hours before FAI measurement.”True
ASTM D618 specifies that thermoplastic parts must be conditioned at 23°C ±2°C and 50% ±5% relative humidity for a minimum of 4 hours before dimensional measurement. This is critical because injection-molded parts continue to shrink and warp after ejection as residual stresses relax and absorbed heat dissipates. Measuring hot parts produces systematically larger readings that do not represent the part’s final dimensions.
“FAI only needs to be performed once for the life of a mold.”False
FAI must be repeated whenever a defined change occurs: mold steel modification, new material lot from a different supplier, change in molding facility or machine, design revision, or production interruption exceeding a customer-defined period (typically 12 months). The logic is that any of these changes can alter part dimensions or properties. A single FAI approval does not cover parts made under materially different conditions.
Which Dimensions Are Most Critical to Measure in Injection Molded Parts?
사출 성형 공정 variables directly affect four categories of dimensions that are most likely to deviate from nominal. Understanding which features are at highest risk helps quality engineers prioritize CMM time and flag potential issues during DFM review.
Wall thickness is the single most critical dimension because it controls both structural performance and cooling uniformity. Target tolerance for uniform wall sections is typically ±0.1 mm for non-critical features and ±0.05 mm for critical-to-fit interfaces. Gate location and dimensions affect fill pattern, weld line position, and surface cosmetics. Boss diameter and depth control thread engagement and press-fit retention. Snap-fit arm length and tip geometry determine assembly force and retention strength—even a 0.1 mm deviation in snap-fit tip height can increase insertion force by 30–50%.

Flatness and warpage are especially problematic for large, thin-walled parts. A 200 mm × 150 mm panel with 2 mm nominal wall thickness can warp by 0.5–2.0 mm if cooling is non-uniform or if packing pressure is not optimized. FAI flatness measurements are taken on a granite surface plate using dial indicators at a defined grid of points—typically every 25 mm. 금형 흐름 분석 simulation can predict warpage before steel is cut, but FAI is the ground truth.
What Tools Are Used to Measure Parts During FAI?
그리고 3 (CMM) is the gold standard for FAI dimensional verification. A CMM probes the part surface at programmed points and reports actual coordinates versus nominal CAD data. Modern CMMs achieve measurement uncertainty of ±0.002 mm under controlled conditions. For production FAI, the CMM program is written from the 3D CAD model and then validated against the ballooned drawing to confirm every feature is captured.
Not all features require CMM. Thread gauges (go/no-go) verify thread engagement more quickly than CMM for standard thread forms. Vision systems measure 2D profile features—hole diameters, edge radii, slot widths—with sub-micron accuracy at high throughput. Digital calipers and micrometers are acceptable for non-critical features (tolerance ≥ ±0.1 mm) when calibrated to NIST-traceable standards. Optical comparators project part silhouettes for rapid profile checking on complex 2D contours.
In our factory, we operate a Zeiss Contura CMM with a 0.001 mm resolution probe for all critical-feature FAI measurements. For 소량 사출 성형 programs where a full CMM program may not be cost-justified, we use a combination of calibrated hand tools and a structured light 3D scanner to capture full-surface deviation maps against the CAD nominal.
How Long Does a First Article Inspection Take?
FAI duration depends on part complexity (number of drawing features), available measurement equipment, and customer reporting requirements. A simple two-cavity mold with 25–40 drawing balloons typically takes 1–2 days from part conditioning to completed FAIR submission. A complex 8-cavity medical device component with 120+ balloons, GD&T callouts, and material traceability requirements may take 5–7 working days.
The biggest time drivers are CMM program development (4–16 hours for a new program) and customer-required reports with statistical analysis (Cpk calculations for 20–30 critical features). Customers who provide CAD models and a pre-ballooned drawing dramatically reduce FAI turnaround time. Those who only supply a 2D PDF drawing require our team to model the nominal geometry before CMM programming can begin.
At ZetarMold, we build FAI time into every project schedule at the mold qualification stage. Customers who treat FAI as an afterthought—requesting it only after they expected parts to ship—create delays. Our standard lead time commitment: T1 trial parts within 4 weeks of mold approval; FAI report within 5 business days of T1 parts being conditioned; production release within 3 business days of customer FAIR approval.
What Happens If a Part Fails First Article Inspection?
FAI failure means that one or more measured features fall outside their drawing tolerance on the first-article sample parts. The response depends on the nature and magnitude of the deviation. Minor deviations (within 20% of the tolerance band outside nominal) may be addressed through process adjustment—changing pack pressure, cooling time, or melt temperature—without touching the mold steel. These are documented as process NCRs and re-measured on a fresh set of conditioned parts.
Dimensional deviations that exceed process adjustment capability require mold steel modification. Steel removal (cutting more material) is straightforward; steel addition (welding or insert replacement) is more expensive and time-consuming. In either case, a partial re-FAI is performed: only the affected features and any dimensions that could have been influenced by the modification need to be re-measured. A full re-FAI is required if the modification involved significant steel removal affecting multiple cavity regions.
Some customers allow a Deviation Approval (also called a concession or waiver) for features that are marginally out of tolerance but demonstrably do not affect function or assembly. This requires engineering sign-off from the customer and a defined review timeline. Deviations are never permanent; the mold must be corrected before the next tool change or at the next scheduled maintenance window. In our factory, we track all open deviations in our ERP system and flag them for action at each mold service interval.
Frequently Asked Questions About First Article Inspection in Injection Molding
FAI는 모든 새로운 사출 금형에 필요합니까, 아니면 규제 산업에만 필요합니까?
FAI is mandatory for aerospace (AS9102), automotive (PPAP), and medical device (ISO 13485 / FDA 21 CFR Part 820) supply chains. However, any manufacturer running injection molds for precision assemblies should perform FAI regardless of industry, because the cost of discovering dimensional non-conformance at production scale vastly exceeds the cost of a structured first-article inspection. At ZetarMold, we recommend FAI for any production program with tolerances tighter than ±0.15 mm or any assembly with critical-to-function fit interfaces, irrespective of the customer’s industry sector.
FAI에서 일반적으로 몇 개의 부품을 검사하나요?
The standard minimum is 3–5 parts from the actual production mold, running under production-intent process parameters. For multi-cavity molds, parts should be taken from every cavity—not just one representative part. If you have a 4-cavity mold, a proper FAI measures parts from all four cavities and records cavity-specific data. Cavity-to-cavity variation is a common failure mode in injection molding; FAI is the only way to confirm that all cavities are within tolerance simultaneously. Some customers specify larger sample sizes (10–30 parts) for statistical process capability calculations.
FAI와 PPAP의 차이점은 무엇인가요?
FAI (First Article Inspection) is a measurement and verification activity—it confirms that a specific part from a specific mold meets its drawing. PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) is a broader submission package required by automotive customers that includes FAI data as one of its 18 required elements, alongside design records, process flow diagrams, control plans, MSA studies, and capacity analysis. PPAP Level 3 (the most common) requires all 18 elements to be submitted to and approved by the customer. FAI is necessary but not sufficient for PPAP; PPAP wraps FAI inside a larger quality management framework.
FAI는 몰더가 수행할 수 있나요, 아니면 독립 실험실에서 수행해야 하나요?
In most commercial and industrial applications, the molder’s own quality team performs the FAI using calibrated, NIST-traceable measurement equipment. The customer reviews and approves the FAIR. For aerospace and defense applications, some customers require that FAI be witnessed by their own quality representative or a third-party inspection agency. Medical device applications under FDA oversight may require measurement system analysis (MSA / Gage R&R studies) to demonstrate that the molder’s measurement process itself is capable before FAI data is considered valid.
What should I do if I receive a FAIR with some features marked ‘actual dimension not reported’?
Any feature listed on the drawing that appears in the ballooned inspection plan must be measured and reported. ‘Not reported’ entries indicate an incomplete FAI and are not acceptable for formal approval. Common reasons for missing measurements include: features that are difficult to access with standard tooling (requiring fixtures or specialized probes), features inadvertently omitted during drawing ballooning, or features that require destructive testing (cross-section cuts for internal wall thickness). For each case, the molder must either provide measurement data, request a customer deviation, or use alternative measurement methods. Accept no FAIR with blank or ‘N/A’ entries unless formally approved.
사출 성형에서 재료 수축이 FAI 결과에 어떤 영향을 미치나요?
Material shrinkage is the primary reason why injection-molded part dimensions differ from the mold cavity dimensions, and it is a major source of FAI failures. Most engineering thermoplastics shrink 0.3–2.0% as they cool from melt temperature to ambient. The mold cavity is intentionally cut oversize by the expected shrinkage factor, but actual shrinkage varies with wall thickness, melt temperature, packing pressure, cooling rate, and material lot. FAI catches cases where actual shrinkage deviates from the design assumption. When FAI shows a systematic dimensional offset across all measured features, the root cause is almost always a shrinkage factor error, which is corrected by steel adjustment.
-
First Article Inspection: First Article Inspection (FAI) is a formal validation process that verifies the first production part or assembly from a new or modified manufacturing process meets all engineering design requirements before mass production begins. ↩
-
AS9102: AS9102 refers to the aerospace industry standard that defines requirements for First Article Inspection reports, specifying documentation, dimensional verification, and material certification procedures. ↩
-
Coordinate Measuring Machine: A Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) is a precision metrology device that measures the physical geometrical characteristics of a part by probing its surface with a contact or non-contact sensor, typically achieving accuracy within ±0.001 mm. ↩
-
PPAP: PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) is an automotive industry standard that requires suppliers to demonstrate, through documented evidence including FAI data, that their manufacturing process can consistently produce parts meeting all customer specifications. ↩
-
GD&T: GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing) is an engineering notation system used on technical drawings to define the allowable variation in form, size, orientation, and location of part features, providing a universal language for precision manufacturing. ↩