{"id":16667,"date":"2026-03-03T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-03T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/?p=16667"},"modified":"2026-04-09T08:05:00","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T00:05:00","slug":"spritzgussform-faq","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/spritzgussform-faq\/","title":{"rendered":"Liste der FAQ zu Spritzgussformen"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n Wichtigste Erkenntnisse<\/strong>
\n - Spritzgussform<\/a>Pr\u00e4zisionsspritzgussformwerkzeug mit Mehrfachkavit\u00e4tenkonfiguration
\n \u2013 Mold cost ranges from $3,000 for simple prototype tooling to over $100,000 for complex multi-cavity production molds.
\n \u2013 The most common molding defects\u2014sink marks, warpage, and flash\u2014are preventable with proper mold design and process control.
\n \u2013 Steel P20 and H13 are the most widely used mold materials, chosen for their balance of machinability, durability, and thermal performance.\n<\/div>\n

What Exactly Is an Injection Mold and How Does It Work?<\/h2>\n

Ein Spritzgie\u00dfwerkzeug ist ein Pr\u00e4zisionswerkzeug aus Stahl oder Aluminium mit bearbeiteten Kavit\u00e4ten, die die Form eines Kunststoffteils definieren. In unserer Fabrik beschreiben wir es einfach: Das Werkzeug ist das Herz des Spritzgie\u00dfens. Geschmolzener Kunststoff \u2013 auf 200\u2013320\u00b0C erhitzt, je nach Kunststoff \u2013 wird unter Druck von 700\u20131,400 bar in das geschlossene Werkzeug injiziert. Die K\u00fchlkan\u00e4le des Werkzeugs senken die Schmelztemperatur innerhalb Sekunden unter den Erstarrungspunkt des Materials, das Werkzeug \u00f6ffnet sich, und Aussto\u00dfstifte dr\u00fccken das fertige Teil heraus. Der gesamte Kreislauf dauert nur 5 Sekunden f\u00fcr d\u00fcnnwandige Teile oder mehrere Minuten f\u00fcr dickwandige Strukturkomponenten.<\/p>\n

The mold itself consists of two main halves: the cavity side (A-plate) and the core side (B-plate). These interlock at the parting line, which you can see as a faint seam on most molded parts. Inside, the runner system channels plastic from the machine nozzle through sprues and runners into the gate\u2014the controlled entry point to the cavity. Vents machined to 0.01\u20130.02 mm depth allow trapped air to escape without creating flash.<\/p>\n

\n \"Diagram
Cross-section of a typical two-plate injection mold showing cavity, core, runner system, and cooling channels.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What Are the Main Types of Injection Molds?<\/h2>\n

The main types of injection molds are two-plate molds, three-plate molds, hot runner molds, family molds, and multi-cavity molds\u2014each suited to different production needs and part geometries. In our facility, we run all five types daily, and choosing the right type is often the single biggest cost decision a customer makes.<\/p>\n

Zwei-Platten-Formen<\/strong> are the industry workhorse. They split into two halves at one parting plane, making them the easiest to design, maintain, and repair. We use them for roughly 70% of our projects.<\/p>\n

Drei-Platten-Formen<\/strong> add a second parting plane, allowing the runner to separate from the part automatically. This gives designers freedom to gate anywhere on the part surface\u2014ideal for complex geometries where a side gate would leave a mark in a visible area.<\/p>\n

Hei\u00dfkanal-Werkzeuge<\/strong> eliminiert den kalten Anguss komplett durch Halten des Kunststoff geschmolzen im Werkzeug. Wir haben Kunden 15\u201330% Materialkosten auf Hochvolumenprojekte gespart durch Wechsel zu Hotrunner, obwohl die Werkzeugkosten vorab $8,000\u2013$20,000 h\u00f6her sind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Form Typ<\/th>\nTypical Cost Premium<\/th>\nAm besten f\u00fcr<\/th>\nRunner Waste<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Two-Plate Cold Runner<\/td>\nBaseline<\/td>\nGeneral production<\/td>\n5\u201330% by weight<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Three-Plate Cold Runner<\/td>\n+10\u201320%<\/td>\nComplex gate positioning<\/td>\n5\u201330% by weight<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hei\u00dfer L\u00e4ufer<\/td>\n+30\u201380%<\/td>\nHigh-volume, no runner waste<\/td>\nNear zero<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Multi-Cavity (8\u201332 cavities)<\/td>\n+50\u2013200%<\/td>\nVery high-volume, same part<\/td>\nVaries<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Family Mold<\/td>\n+20\u201340%<\/td>\nMultiple different parts in one mold<\/td>\nVaries<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n \"Precision
Multi-cavity molds (left) produce identical parts per shot; family molds (right) produce different parts simultaneously.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n

<\/svg> \u201eEin teureres Werkzeug produziert immer besser Teile.\u201c<\/b>Falsch<\/span><\/p>\n

Mold cost reflects complexity and cavity count, not necessarily part quality. A simple $5,000 single-cavity mold with excellent steel and polish will outperform a poorly designed $50,000 multi-cavity tool every time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/svg> \u201eWerkzeugqualit\u00e4t h\u00e4ngt von Designpr\u00e4zision und Stahlwahl ab, nicht nur vom Preis.\u201c<\/b>Wahr<\/span><\/p>\n

The key quality factors are proper venting, balanced cooling channels, correct draft angles, and appropriate steel hardness for the production volume. These design decisions matter far more than total cost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

What Materials Are Used to Make Injection Molds?<\/h2>\n

Injection molds are made primarily from tool steels\u2014most commonly P20, H13, S136, and NAK80\u2014selected based on required production volume, plastic material being run, and surface finish requirements. In our experience, choosing the wrong steel grade is one of the most common and costly mistakes in mold procurement.<\/p>\n

P20 (Pre-hardened steel, 28\u201332 HRC)<\/strong> is the most widely used mold base material worldwide. It machines easily, holds a good polish to SPI B-2 standard, and handles up to 500,000 shots with most commodity plastics like ABS, PP, and PE. We recommend P20 for most production molds in the 50,000\u2013500,000 shot range.<\/p>\n

H13 (Hot work tool steel, 44\u201348 HRC after heat treatment)<\/strong> excels with abrasive or high-temperature resins. When customers run glass-filled nylon or PC\/ABS at over 300\u00b0C, we specify H13 core and cavity inserts. It can deliver 1\u20132 million shots with proper maintenance.<\/p>\n

S136 (Stainless tool steel)<\/strong> is our standard specification for medical, food-contact, and optical applications. Its corrosion resistance prevents rust from PVC outgassing and maintains mirror-polish finishes (SPI A-1 to A-2) over millions of cycles.<\/p>\n

For prototype molds needing just 1,000\u201310,000 parts, we often use 7075 aluminum\u2014it machines 3\u20135\u00d7 faster than steel, cutting prototype lead time from 4 weeks to 1\u20132 weeks at 40\u201360% lower cost.<\/p>\n

\n \"Two
Injection molds machined from P20 and H13 tool steel, showing the precision cavity surfaces required for accurate part replication.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

How Is Mold Cost Calculated and What Drives the Price?<\/h2>\n

Injection mold cost is calculated based on part complexity, number of cavities, steel grade, surface finish, and required tolerances\u2014typically ranging from $3,000 for simple prototype tools to $150,000+ for complex production molds. We quote hundreds of molds per year, and the same part can vary by 3\u00d7 in cost depending on specifications.<\/p>\n

The biggest cost driver is machining time<\/strong>Die Schmelztemperatur ist die Temperatur, bei der das Kunststoffmaterial vollst\u00e4ndig plastifiziert und bereit f\u00fcr die Einspritzung ist; sie muss innerhalb des vom Harzhersteller empfohlenen Bereichs (typischerweise \u00b110\u00b0C) kontrolliert werden, um eine gleichbleibende Viskosit\u00e4t, F\u00fcllverhalten und Bauteilqualit\u00e4t zu gew\u00e4hrleisten.<\/p>\n

The second major factor is cavity count<\/strong>. A 16-cavity mold costs roughly 3\u20134\u00d7 more than a single-cavity mold (not 16\u00d7, because the mold base, cooling, and ejection systems are shared). For parts needing 1 million+ units per year, multi-cavity tooling quickly pays for itself through lower per-piece cycle costs.<\/p>\n

Tolerances and surface finish<\/strong> also drive cost significantly. A mold held to \u00b10.05 mm costs far more than one to \u00b10.1 mm\u2014not because the target is harder, but because inspection, fitting, and hand-work time multiplies. Mirror-finish cavities (SPI A-1) require 20\u201340 hours of polishing per cavity by experienced craftsmen.<\/p>\n

\n \"Injection
Gate selection\u2014edge, submarine, or hot tip\u2014significantly impacts mold cost and finished part appearance.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What Are the Most Common Injection Molding Defects and How Are They Fixed?<\/h2>\n

Die h\u00e4ufigsten Spritzgie\u00dffehler sind Einfallstellen, Verzug, Kurzsch\u00fcsse, Grat und Bindelinien \u2013 alle k\u00f6nnen typisch durch Anpassung der Prozessparameter, Werkzeugmodifikation oder Teilredesign behoben werden. In unserer Fabrik haben wir festgestellt, dass \u00fcber 80% der Fehler von Prozessparametern statt Werkzeugdesignfehlern herr\u00fchren, was gut ist, weil Prozesskorrekturen schneller und billiger sind als Werkzeug\u00e4nderungen.<\/p>\n

Sinkende Markierungen<\/strong> appear as surface depressions over thick sections. The root cause is excessive wall thickness or insufficient shrinkage compensation<\/a>1<\/a><\/sup> in the mold design. We fix most sink mark issues by increasing holding pressure (typically 50\u201380% of injection pressure) and extending hold time by 0.5\u20132 seconds.<\/p>\n

Verzug<\/strong> results from uneven cooling, asymmetric wall thickness, or mismatched melt temperature2<\/a><\/sup> across the part. Balanced cooling channel design is the permanent fix; in the short term, we adjust mold temperature differentially\u2014running the concave side warmer than the convex side to compensate.<\/p>\n

Blitzlicht<\/strong> ist d\u00fcnne Kunststofffolie an der Trennkante, verursacht durch \u00fcberh\u00f6hten Injektionsdruck, abgenutzte Werkzeugoberfl\u00e4chen oder unzureichende Schlie\u00dfkraft. Wir pr\u00fcfen Trennkantengenauigkeit auf 0,005 mm Flachheit; wenn das Werkzeug gut ist, zeigt Grat typisch, dass Injektionsdruck die Schlie\u00dfkraft der Maschine \u00fcberschreitet.<\/p>\n

\n \"Common
Visual examples of common injection molding defects: sink marks, warpage, flash, and weld lines\u2014all correctable with proper process control.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n

<\/svg> \u201eErh\u00f6hung der Injektionsgeschwindigkeit behebt immer Kurzsch\u00fcsse.\u201c<\/b>Falsch<\/span><\/p>\n

Short shots (incomplete fills) are more often caused by insufficient venting or blocked gates than by injection speed. Blindly increasing speed can worsen burn marks and jetting without solving the fill problem.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/svg> \u201eDiagnose der Ursache vor Anpassung der Prozessparameter beugt Kurzsch\u00fcsse effektiv vor.\u201c<\/b>Wahr<\/span><\/p>\n

Proper diagnosis\u2014checking vent depth (should be 0.01\u20130.02 mm), gate size, melt temperature, and material moisture\u2014identifies whether the short shot is a tooling, process, or material issue before any adjustments are made.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

How Long Does an Injection Mold Last and How Should It Be Maintained?<\/h2>\n

Ein gut gepflegtes Spritzgie\u00dfwerkzeug l\u00e4uft typisch 500,000 bis 1,000,000 Sch\u00fcsse f\u00fcr P20-Stahlwerkzeuge, 1\u20132 Millionen Sch\u00fcsse f\u00fcr H13-Werkzeuge und 5+ Millionen f\u00fcr geh\u00e4rtete S136 oder 420SS-Werkzeuge. Wir haben Werkzeuge in unserer Anlage gesehen, die nach 3 Millionen Sch\u00fcssen noch stark laufen \u2013 und andere, die nach 50,000 durch schlechte Pflege ausfallen. Der Unterschied liegt fast vollst\u00e4ndig im Pflegeprotokoll.<\/p>\n

After every production run, we clean the mold with approved plastic-safe solvents, blow out cooling passages, inspect parting lines for wear or damage, apply rust-inhibiting oil to all steel surfaces, and store the mold in a climate-controlled environment. This routine takes 1\u20132 hours per mold but adds hundreds of thousands of shots to service life.<\/p>\n

The most critical maintenance interval is the preventive maintenance (PM) inspection<\/strong>\u2014in our factory, we schedule full PM every 50,000 shots. This includes measuring cavity dimensions against original specs (catching wear before it exceeds tolerance), checking ejector pin fit and straightness, testing cooling channel flow rates, and re-polishing gate areas that experience high shear stress.<\/p>\n

\n \"Technician
Regular preventive maintenance\u2014cleaning, inspection, and lubrication\u2014is the most cost-effective way to extend mold life.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What Is the Difference Between a Prototype Mold and a Production Mold?<\/h2>\n

A prototype mold is a lower-cost, shorter-lead-time tool designed for 1,000\u201350,000 shots to validate part design; a production mold is a hardened steel tool engineered for 500,000+ shots at full production tolerances. In our operation, we produce both\u2014and we advise every customer to start with a prototype mold unless they have 100% confidence in their design.<\/p>\n

Prototypwerkzeuge (auch \u201eSoft Tools\u201c genannt) verwenden typisch Aluminium oder P20-Stahl und werden mit Toleranzen von \u00b10,1 mm bearbeitet. Sie werden in 2\u20134 Wochen produziert und kosten $3,000\u2013$15,000. Ihr Zweck ist die Erzeugung echter, produktionsrepr\u00e4sentativer Teile \u2013 nicht 3D-gedruckte Proben oder RTV-Guss-Teile \u2013 f\u00fcr Funktionspr\u00fcfung, regulatorische Einreichung und Montagevalidierung.<\/p>\n

Produktionswerkzeuge verwenden geh\u00e4rteten H13 oder S136-Stahl, haben \u00b10,01\u20130,05 mm Toleranzen, enthalten vollst\u00e4ndige K\u00fchl- und Aussto\u00dfsysteme optimiert f\u00fcr Kreislaufzeit und sind f\u00fcr 5\u201320+ Jahre Service gebaut. Lieferzeit ist 4\u20138 Wochen und Kosten sind $8,000\u2013$150,000+. Wir haben Kunden gesehen, die die Prototypphase \u00fcberspringen und drei Sets Produktionswerkzeugmodifikationen bezahlen \u2013 weit mehr als das Prototypwerkzeug, das sie vermieden.<\/p>\n

\n \"Comparison
Prototype molds (soft tooling) provide fast, low-cost design validation before committing to full production tooling investment.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Frequently Asked Questions About Injection Molds<\/h2>\n
\n \"Variety
Injection molding produces everything from medical devices to automotive panels\u2014the FAQ below covers the most common questions we receive.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Q: How long does it take to make an injection mold?<\/strong>
\nA: Standard production molds take 4\u20136 weeks; complex molds with sliders and lifters take 6\u201310 weeks. Prototype molds in aluminum can be completed in 1\u20133 weeks. Lead time is primarily driven by machining and polishing hours, not waiting time.<\/p>\n

Q: What is the minimum order quantity for injection molding?<\/strong>
\nA: There is no technical minimum\u2014you can run 1 shot. Economically, injection molding becomes cost-competitive versus 3D printing at roughly 500\u20131,000 parts, depending on part complexity and size. Below that, the mold amortization cost per part is too high.<\/p>\n

Q: Can injection molds be repaired if damaged?<\/strong>
\nA: Yes, most mold damage is repairable. Common repairs include welding and re-machining worn cavity areas, replacing damaged ejector pins, re-polishing scratched surfaces, and refitting worn parting lines. In our repair shop, we restore molds that customers have given up on\u2014successfully returning them to production-quality condition.<\/p>\n

Q: What draft angle is required for injection molded parts?<\/strong>
\nA: A minimum of 1\u00b0\u20132\u00b0 draft per side is required for smooth ejection from most molds. Textured surfaces require 3\u00b0\u20135\u00b0 additional draft per 0.025 mm of texture depth. Insufficient Entformungsschr\u00e4ge<\/a>3<\/a><\/sup> is one of the most common design errors we see from customers submitting their first injection molding project.<\/p>\n

Q: What is a mold flow analysis and do I need one?<\/strong>
\nA: Moldflow-Analyse<\/a>4<\/a><\/sup> (using software like Moldflow or Moldex3D) simulates plastic filling, packing, and cooling to predict defects before the mold is cut. We recommend it for any part thicker than 4 mm, parts with varying wall thickness, optical components, or structural parts. The $500\u2013$2,000 analysis cost is trivial compared to a $20,000 mold modification.<\/p>\n

Q: How many cavities should my mold have?<\/strong>
\nA: Cavity count should match your annual volume demand divided by the number of machine hours per year, factoring in cycle time. As a rule of thumb: under 100,000 parts\/year \u2192 1\u20132 cavities; 100,000\u2013500,000 parts\/year \u2192 4\u20138 cavities; 500,000+ parts\/year \u2192 8\u201332 cavities. We calculate the optimal cavity count during every quoting process.<\/p>\n

Q: What is the difference between a cold runner and hot runner system?<\/strong>
\nA: A cold runner is an unheated channel that solidifies with each shot and is either recycled or discarded; a hot runner keeps the plastic permanently molten inside the mold using electric heaters, eliminating runner waste. Hot runners cost more upfront ($8,000\u2013$20,000 extra) but reduce material cost, cycle time, and post-processing on high-volume projects.<\/p>\n

Zusammenfassung<\/h2>\n
\n \"Injection
Modern injection molding combines precision tooling, optimized process parameters, and rigorous quality control to produce consistent, high-quality plastic parts at scale.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Injection molding remains one of the most versatile and economical manufacturing processes for plastic parts. The key to success lies in understanding the fundamentals: choosing the right mold type and steel for your volume, designing for moldability from the start (draft angles, uniform wall thickness, adequate venting), and establishing a disciplined maintenance program to protect your tooling investment.<\/p>\n

In unserer Fabrik haben wir gelernt, dass die meisten Kundenfrustrationen \u2013 Kosten\u00fcberschreitung, Qualit\u00e4tsprobleme, versp\u00e4tete Lieferung \u2013 auf Entscheidungen in der Designphase zur\u00fcckzuf\u00fchren sind, nicht auf der Produktionsfl\u00e4che. Ein Teil, das f\u00fcr Spritzgie\u00dfen mit korrekter Wanddicke, Schr\u00e4gungswinkel und Angussstelle designed ist, produziert hervorragende Ergebnisse sogar in einem moderat-kostenden Werkzeug. Ein schlecht designed Teil k\u00e4mpft sogar im teuersten Werkzeug.<\/p>\n

Ob Sie Ihr erstes Prototypwerkzeug ordern oder ein Hochvolumen-Mehrkavit\u00e4ten-Produktionswerkzeug planen, die Fragen in diesem Leitfaden sollten Ihnen helfen, besser informierte Entscheidungen zu machen und effektiver mit Ihrem Werkzeugbauer zu arbeiten. Sehen Sie unsere Injection Molding Complete Guide<\/strong> for a comprehensive overview.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
    \n
  1. \n

    Schrumpfkompensation ist die Praxis, Werkzeugkavit\u00e4ten etwas gr\u00f6\u00dfer als die gew\u00fcnschten Endteilma\u00dfe zu designen, um die Volumenreduktion zu ber\u00fccksichtigen, die beim K\u00fchlen und Erstarrung von geschmolzenem Kunststoff auftritt, typisch 0,2\u20132,0% je nach Kunststoff.↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Schmelztemperatur ist die Temperatur, bei der das Kunststoffmaterial vollst\u00e4ndig plastifiziert und bereit f\u00fcr Injektion ist; sie muss innerhalb des empfohlenen Bereichs des Kunststoffhersteller kontrolliert werden (typisch \u00b110\u00b0C), um konsistente Viskosit\u00e4t, F\u00fcllverhalten und Teilqualit\u00e4t zu sichern.↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Der Schr\u00e4gungswinkel ist die Verj\u00fcngung an den vertikalen Wandungen eines geformten Teils, senkrecht zur Trennkante, die ein sauberes Entfernen des Teils aus dem Werkzeug erm\u00f6glicht, ohne Kratzer oder Kleben; unzureichende Schr\u00e4gung f\u00fchrt zu Aussto\u00dfproblemen und Oberfl\u00e4chenbesch\u00e4digung.↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    Werkzeugflussanalyse ist eine Computersimulation, die den Fluss, K\u00fchlung und Erstarrung von geschmolzenem Kunststoff in einer Werkzeugkavit\u00e4t modelliert, und potenzielle Fehler wie Bindelinien, Luftfallen und Verzug identifiziert, bevor das physikalische Werkzeug produziert wird.↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Need a Quote for Your Injection Molding Project?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Get competitive pricing, DFM feedback, and production timeline from ZetarMold\u2019s engineering team.<\/p>\n

    Request a Free Quote \u2192<\/a> See our Injection Molding Complete Guide<\/a> for a comprehensive overview.<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Wichtige Erkenntnisse \u2013 Spritzgussformen sind Pr\u00e4zisionswerkzeuge, die Tausende bis Millionen identischer Teile produzieren k\u00f6nnen, was sie ideal f\u00fcr die Serienfertigung macht. \u2013 Die Formkosten reichen von $3.000 f\u00fcr einfache Prototypenwerkzeuge bis \u00fcber $100.000 f\u00fcr komplexe Mehrfachkavit\u00e4ten-Produktionsformen. \u2013 Die h\u00e4ufigsten Formfehler \u2013 Einfallstellen, Verzug und Gratbildung \u2013 lassen sich mit einer ordnungsgem\u00e4\u00dfen Form [\u2026] vermeiden.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12245,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Injection Mold FAQ: Top Questions Answered","_seopress_titles_desc":"Get answers to the most common injection mold questions covering mold types, costs, defects, maintenance, and lead times from our factory experts.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[159,155,160,139,173],"meta_box":{"post-to-quiz_to":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16667"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16667\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zetarmold.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}